Throughout the years, individuals have used the platform to criticize the judges who were either biased or inadequate in making decisions in the boxing realm. Some feel accountable to speak out when the actions of such judges harm the fighters and drive away the fans.
Now, there’s a call for consistency, hence the need to step up and support the judges who declared Tony Harrison the winner over Jermell Charlo through a unanimous decision last weekend, securing a world title in junior middleweight. Many will find fault with the critics’ perspective.
The style employed by fighters in achieving this victory is inconsequential; what matters is their ability to advance, retreat, and maneuver tactically. As long as the fighters maintain control during the bout, outmaneuvering their opponent, they deserve to come out on top. This is precisely what Harrison has accomplished.
In the world of Ultimate Fighting Champion, superior strength and aggression do not determine the outcome, nor does the sheer force behind each punch. The critical aspect of a UFC bout, where two skilled combatants face off, is the effectiveness of their strikes.
Humans are naturally drawn to symbols of power and might. Competitions like bodybuilding hold significant meaning. The battleground isn’t confined to a boxing ring or a realm of absolute truth. Any fighter who steps into the ring is well aware of the inherent risks involved in the sport.
